Вопросы

A. McDonald’s Restaurants Ltd.

B. Silver Dollar Ventures, LLP

C. Widget Specialists Company

D. Tyler, Inez, and Paulo Investments

8

LittleCorp, Inc., has started to create a lot of buzz in the technology industry. BigCorp has indicated some interest in purchasing LittleCorp. LittleCorp has three shareholders: Tyler, Inez, and Paulo. Tyler and Inez both want to sell to BigCorp, but Paulo doesn’t want to. Thus, Tyler and Inez hatch an ingenious plan: they will call a special meeting of LittleCorp’s shareholders. They send out a notice to all of the shareholders stating that the purpose of the special meeting is to consider expanding the number of directors from three to four, knowing that Paulo doesn’t care about that issue. When the meeting comes, Paulo doesn’t show up, and Tyler and Inez vote to sell LittleCorp to BigCorp. When Paulo finds out what happened, he sues in court to stop the sale. Who wins?

A. Paulo wins because he did not consent to the sale of LittleCorp to BigCorp.

B. Tyler and Inez win because Paulo failed to show up for a properly called special meeting of shareholders, so he must accept the consequences of that meeting.

C. Tyler and Inez win because they hold more shares, and thus more votes, than Paulo.

D. Paulo wins because Tyler and Inez took an action at a special shareholders meeting that was not listed on the notice of meeting.

9

A. Decide upon the long-term strategy of the company

B. Approve important corporate decisions such as whether to merge with another company

C. Manage the day-to-day operations of the company

D. Decide upon the compensation packages for the company’s top executives

9

A. BigCorp and LittleCorp release products that directly compete with one another.

B. BigCorp and LittleCorp both operate in the same general industry.

C. BigCorp offers Paulo a job, which means he would have to leave his job at LittleCorp.

D. LittleCorp decides to merge with a company in a different industry than both BigCorp and LittleCorp.

13

Little LLC, was formed under Oregon’s limited liability company statute, which provides that all Oregon LLCs must maintain sufficient cash on hand to pay any employee injury claims (Oregon’s statute doesn’t actually say that, but suppose it does for now). Despite being organized in Oregon, Little LLC does almost all of its business in neighboring Washington. Washington’s LLC statute does not require LLCs to maintain any cash reserves. One of Little LLC’s employees is injured on the job in Seattle, Washington, and sues Little LLC, claiming that it is in violation of the law by not having enough cash on hand to pay the employee’s injury claim. Little LLC defends itself by saying that it isn’t required to maintain a cash reserve because it's operating in Washington and Washington doesn’t require it. Who wins?

A. The employee wins because Little LLC is an Oregon LLC and therefore Oregon’s LLC statute applies, even when Little LLC is operating outside of Oregon.

B. Little LLC wins because, even though it is an Oregon LLC, it is doing business in Washington and therefore Washington’s LLC statute applied.

C. The employee wins because it would be unfair to allow Little LLC off the hook for the employee’s job-related injury.

D. Little LLC wins because it is against public policy to require an employer to pay for its employees’ job-related injuries.

12
  1. Предметом исключительного ведения Российской Федерации
  2. Предметом совместного ведения Российской Федерации и ее субъектов
  3. Предметом ведения субъектов Российской Федерации
14
  1. На государственных гражданских служащих и муниципальных служащих
  2. На военнослужащих при исполнении ими обязанностей военной службы
  3. На спортсменов и тренеров
15
  1. Поручения руководителя
  2. Конкретную работу, обозначенную в трудовом договоре
  3. Трудовую функцию
  4. Служебные обязанности
16
  1. Отношения по организации труда и управлению трудом
  2. Отношения по пенсионному обеспечению
  3. Отношения по материальной ответственности работодателей и работников в сфере труда
  4. Отношения по страхованию требований работников по заработной плате в случае банкротства работодателя
11
  1. Диспозитивное регулирование
  2. Сочетание централизованного и локального регулирования
  3. Преобладание императивных предписаний
  4. Сочетание разрешительных и запретительных правовых норм
  5. Сочетание государственного и договорного регулирования
15
  1. Национальность
  2. Возраст
  3. Климатические условия
  4. Специфика трудовой функции
  5. Пол
13
  1. Не подразумевает деления на части
  2. Состоит из общей и особенной частей
  3. Состоит из общей, особенной и специальной частей верно
17
  1. Институт социального партнерства в сфере труда
  2. Институт проведения забастовок
  3. Институт уголовной ответственности за нарушение отдельных норм трудового права
  4. Институт трудового договора
8
  1. Отношения несамостоятельного труда
  2. Бессрочный характер отношений
  3. Личное выполнение работы работником
  4. Возможность работника свободно распоряжаться своим временем
10
  1. Относятся к предмету трудового права
  2. Относятся к предмету административного права
  3. Относятся к предмету конституционного права
12
← Предыдущая Следующая → 1 2
Показаны 16-30 из 30